Let me see if I understand this correctly:
Quote:
People close to the family reportedly said they warned him she may do something awful.
So... why didn't THEY do anything to prevent HER from doing something awful?
If these people were so insightful about this woman and knew the potential dangers she presented...
But did *NOTHING* themselves at all to stop her...
Why are they blaming the HIM for their own share of the negligence?
Exactly!
This sounds exactly the same mentality/attitude adopted when Andrea Yates drowned and murdered her five SONS systematically.
I distinctly remember on a episode of oprah (queen of misandry) where there was nothing but sympathy and a constant deluge of contradictory feminist psychological babble spewing from a panel of biased pro yates supporters.
As you can imagine on oprah there was no dissenting opinion, that aligned with the usual brainwashed oprah drones posing as an audience.
Towards the end of the show oprah spoke to andrea yates then understandably "ex-husband" on the phone, to which the main crux of winfreys questioning was to alleviate and divert responsibility to andrea yates husband.
This mindset that women are never responsible even for the most heinous of crimes ie- the murder of children, is becoming more ingrained into the psyche of the general population.
The 24/7 brainwashing throughout every aspect of the media promoting the validity of thousands of unresearched variants of depression to hormones etc.
These "excuses" are only valid in the eyes of the law if the host posseses a vagina, as women have the "copyright" on every aspect of VICTIMOLOGY, men need not apply!