It was bound to happen, Husb blamed 4 womb ripping baby snat

[Gabriel]

Link

Stinnett's mother, Becky Harper, said she wants the accused baby-snatcher to die for her crimes.

"I hope she gets the death penalty," Harper declared. "I don't want to have to pay for her to be in jail."

Harper also blasted Montgomery's "clueless" husband.

She said he bears some responsibility for failing to stop his spouse's manic hunt for a child. People close to the family reportedly said they warned him she may do something awful.

"He had to have been pretty clueless not to have known about this," Harper said. "It sounds like he just didn't want to hear anything about this."

Even Montgomery's mother failed to mount much of a defense of her daughter yesterday.

"I did not have any sense she could murder someone," said Judy Shaughnessy. "I thought she could maybe steal or buy a child -- but not kill to get one."

Ok, so the husband should know, but her mother shouldn't. Double Standard?

Let's see - when a man controls his wife, it is "abuse". When he doesn't and she kills one or 5 people, it's his fault.

[Q]

"It sounds like he just didn't want to hear anything about this."

Nope, he must  have thought  she was a loving wife, a feminine wife who wants a child.  Not typicaly the sign og a homicidal maniac.

Unless everyone can murder, and gender isn't an indicator?

[MacKenzie]

Let me see if I understand this correctly:

People close to the family reportedly said they warned him she may do something awful.[/b]

So... why didn't THEY do anything to prevent HER from doing something awful?

If these people were so insightful about this woman and knew the potential dangers she presented...

But did *NOTHING* themselves at all to stop her...

Why are they blaming the HIM for their own share of the negligence?

[PROFOUND1]

Let me see if I understand this correctly:

Quote:
People close to the family reportedly said they warned him she may do something awful.


So... why didn't THEY do anything to prevent HER from doing something awful?

If these people were so insightful about this woman and knew the potential dangers she presented...

But did *NOTHING* themselves at all to stop her...

Why are they blaming the HIM for their own share of the negligence?

Exactly!

This sounds exactly the same mentality/attitude adopted when Andrea Yates drowned and murdered her five SONS systematically.

I distinctly remember on a episode of oprah (queen of misandry) where there was nothing but sympathy and a constant deluge of contradictory feminist psychological babble spewing from a panel of biased pro yates supporters.

As you can imagine on oprah there was no dissenting opinion, that aligned with the usual brainwashed oprah drones posing as an audience.

Towards the end of the show oprah spoke to andrea yates then understandably "ex-husband" on the phone, to which the main crux of winfreys questioning was to alleviate and divert responsibility to andrea yates husband.

This mindset that women are never responsible even for the most heinous of crimes ie- the murder of children, is becoming more ingrained into the psyche of the general population.

The 24/7 brainwashing throughout every aspect of the media promoting the validity of thousands of unresearched variants of depression to hormones etc.

These "excuses" are only valid in the eyes of the law if the host posseses a vagina, as women have the "copyright" on every aspect of VICTIMOLOGY, men need not apply!