Is "naked aggression" the new American way?

Started by DavidByron, Sep 23, 2002, 07:55 PM

previous topic - next topic
Go Down

DavidByron

http://www.truthout.org/docs_02/09.24A.wrp.history.htm

Quote
Replacing that time-tested and diplomatically pliable stance [the concept of deterrence] are two steel fists. One declares the United States supreme over all nations, now and forever, and warns the world that we will never allow another nation to come close to matching our power. The other bluntly proclaims that we will attack any nation, at any time, in a pre-emptive fashion, if we so choose...

Essentially, the new doctrine for American national security offered by the Bush administration erases all borders, along with several centuries worth of respect for territorial, cultural and governmental sovereignty. Despite several sunshine-filled sentences praising NATO and the United Nations, this strategy would seem to offer little say for anyone but the American government and the American military. My way or the highway. With us or against us. Pick your phrase.


My main question here is whether this idea of naked agression is really all that "new" to America, but this is how American critics of the new war policy are phrasing it, perhaps just to play on Americans huge egos, but at the same time there is something much more in-your-face about Bush's imperialism than previous administrations.  I can't help feeling that's a bad idea.  So much of what the US government does is routinely hidden from its own citizens.  Can Bush really afford to be even as honest as he is being about the US imperialist agenda?

Quote
Marcy Kaptur, Democrat from Ohio, has said, "Naked aggression is not the American way. America, wake up."
size=9]I am the victim of unregulated sarcasm[/size]

DavidByron

Quote
No longer does the U.S. government content itself to rule over a vast continental domain. No longer does it find satisfaction merely in a Monroe Doctrine that proclaims its hegemony in the Western Hemisphere. No, our rulers have declared in sufficiently plain language, in their new "National Security Strategy of the United States," made public on September 20, that they intend to dominate the entire world. Some members of the political class speak openly of empire; others avoid the word but embrace the substance. Make no mistake, however: the American Republic is no longer just sick unto death; it is stone-cold dead.


http://www.lewrockwell.com/higgs/higgs9.html
size=9]I am the victim of unregulated sarcasm[/size]

DavidByron

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/26/arts/26STRA.html?pagewanted=2&ei=1&en=e9c27c0cb95a450c&ex=1036643496

Quote
The historical record is clear," he said. "The U.S. has gone to great lengths to be the dominant power on the earth, first by achieving hegemony in its own region and then by preventing the rise of a peer competitor in other regions like Asia and Europe."

In the 19th century, Professor Mearsheimer argues, the United States struggled for regional hegemony by conquering much of North America, justifying it by the notion of Manifest Destiny. Even before came the Monroe Doctrine, in which America's fifth president warned Europeans that "we should consider any attempt on their part to extend their system to any portion of this hemisphere as dangerous to our peace and safety."

By the end of the 19th century, Mr. Mearsheimer said, America's regional hegemony had largely been established. The United States spent most of the 20th century ensuring that "no other state duplicated that accomplishment."

After 45 years of cold war and containing the Soviet Union, the United States was clearly not eager to envisage a second round of bipolar politics, much less a multipolar world in which the desires of regional powers would have to be taken into account.

The impulse promulgated in the Bush doctrine is certainly not new, he said. "What is new here is that the United States has actually acknowledged what it does, rather than gussy up its impulses with liberal rhetoric."
size=9]I am the victim of unregulated sarcasm[/size]

Eva

Naked aggression IS the American way for any person trying to look at it objectively!

I wonder when the majority of the American people recognize that they live in a state threats other nations? Could it be because of their isolation that so many don't see it?
 would never join a club that would accept me as a member (Groucho Marx)

URnotmeRU

Well Eva. you come here to check out ice cream stands and piss into the wind. Why didnt you take the time to hook up with the wanker to educated the masses?


Arm chair liberals, they are the worst kind. Not that liberals have a good side. :roll:
nd the time will come when you'll see we're all one and life flows on, within you and without you. - George Harrison

Go Up