Biscuit Queen, he didn't change it for me, it was when I first came here. Even before you joined I think.
you could also take the view that muscular men are strong, inspiring, and supreme to weak willed women who do nowt but give birth or whine all day, she is just a birth machine designed to continue his superior genetics.
It would be like this in a patriarchal culture that values males over females.
But in our culture, it is a sign of being a "good specimen" for women.
A strong sturdy work animal that will do all the dirty work and take lots of punishment.
This isn't necessarily consciously recognized by them, it's just what they are attracted to, mostly caused by genetics probably.
Women probably have evolved to be attracted to a man that appears "strong and healthy" so that she can be sure that he can supply her with food and protect her.
It is fit for a "supporter/supported" relationship.
But in the modern world, being the "supporter" means being less valuable.
I think that true loving relationships between males and females can only exist if males and females have equal "strengths", and are equally attracted to each other.
(But this is unrealistic due to genetical differences...)
Otherwise the parasitic psychology of "taking" but not "giving" will keep persisting.