Marriage

Started by Galt, Jun 07, 2005, 06:20 PM

previous topic - next topic
Go Down

Galt

So ... like ... any opinions about marriage here?  LOL

I know that some men here have gotten reamed.  

My pattern has been to live with women for a while until it seems to have passed its usefulness.  I don't know - I have lived with women longer than I have seen divorces being processed (including the marriage beforehand - LOL).

What exactly does marriage mean?  You eternally, irrevocably commit yourself to a woman, and her commitment is ...what?   No, I'm not kidding, the practice is that judges will award women at home with lots and lots of presents, but men who sit at home, while the woman works, are routinely questioned: "why don't you get off your butt?".

I've never been ordered to pay child support, I've never been ordered to pay alimony, so I'm asking - here and now - what motivates men to expose themselves to situations like this.  I'm the ultimate cynic - true - but I only have to pay for myself today.  I even wonder about men who are "happily married".  A guy I know has to be home by 6 p.m. or he doesn't get anything to eat.  This is from a housewife who lives off everything he produces - and he accepts that.  I don't accept that, and never have. Sorry, not worth it.

I can only think I'm a Steppenwolf - it seems that a lot of other men will just work their butts off for a mommy who bakes cookies for them.  Why?  Mommy may be a friggin' dumbshit - buy your cookies at a Deli, and get a woman you can talk to.

Shades of Pale

Quote
I can only think I'm a Steppenwolf - it seems that a lot of other men will just work their butts off for a mommy who bakes cookies for them. Why? Mommy may be a friggin' dumbshit - buy your cookies at a Deli, and get a woman you can talk to.


You appear to believe the two (baking, having someone to talk to) are mutually exclusive.  Why?

It is actually possible to have the good homemade cookies AND excellent conversation.   Can you explain, just once, why you seem so sure it isn't?

As far as the commitment, yes I have irrevocably committed to my wife as she has to me.   We've built a family and a wonderful life together.  We are companions, friends, lovers.   We've raised a responsible and productive next generation.  Someone has to do that.   Everyone doesn't have to but someone does.   The relationship is reciprocal.  

I've tried and apparently failed to describe this to you many times.   Not quite sure why.   I don't mean that I've failed to cause you to want it yourself, as I'm not trying to do that.  But I've tried to describe what it is about it that we want and love, and somehow failed at even that.   Perhaps it's just not something you're going to "get" or maybe it's even like parenthood, where unless you've actually been one you just have no idea.   I'm willing to accept that possibility.

Out of curiosity, does your friend get himself something to eat if he gets home late?  Why does his wife set him rules like that?

angryharry

I don't think that Galt is really saying that no couple can have a great longterm relationship, but he is saying that the probability that it might not turn out well is rather high, and that the man will, most likely, end up losing a great deal should things go wrong. Hence, for men, the risk is too great in his opinion - and getting worse all the time.

I agree with Galt.

If I had a son who was about to marry, I would be worried about him. I would be less worried about a daughter getting married because I know that all the cards would be stacked in her favour.
ttp://www.angryharry.com ... the only site in the entire world with the aforementioned domain address

Galt

Quote from: "Shades of Pale"
It is actually possible to have the good homemade cookies AND excellent conversation.   Can you explain, just once, why you seem so sure it isn't?


That kind of goes to the core, doesn't it?

The answer is: I'm not sure myself how I can substantiate that.

There is a substantial difference between a women who is on a bender to do something in life, who is on the verge of getting a Nobel prize because she just has to reduce an idea to practice - who then unexpectedly gets pregnant - and then feels a responsibility to the child - and

--- a woman who has her target in her sights, a guy will pay for her, and she just has to do the normal things that girls talk about among themselves ...

I guess the difference is on focus.

Another idea is: If there are no kids involved, what is the pressure to get married?  She will leave you if you just live with her and don't marry her?
Maybe that's part of it.

Shades of Pale

Angryharry I absolutely agree.   I am very concerned for my own son in this regard, and he is well aware of the perils of today's legal landscape.  We have known broken-hearted men who have lost their wives, children and homes.   I see many more online.   No doubt it is a huge risk, one that can only be offset by knowing very very well just who you are becoming involved with.   And even then you could end up screwed.

Galt, I know what you are saying, yet again it's a false dichotomy.   For one thing I can't judge my own wife for not being on the brink of a Nobel prize because I sure as shit never had one in my own sights, on my own horizon.  Well raised children are an accomplishment in themselves, and if that's what some people choose to do with the bulk of their lives (their most productive years) it's fine.  That doesn't make them money-grubbing parasites, either.   It's just a false dichotomy.

Thanks for acknowledging that cookies and conversation may both be possible :)

But anyway, let me just take a different tack before I shut up.   Presumably you have heard much (though you haven't been through it and I haven't personally been through it) about men who have had their wives divorce them, and thus lost their wives, children and homes.   Presumably there is SOMETHING that these men found in their lives, with their wives, homes and children, that was good, that was desirable.  Something that even if they didn't quite attain it, was at least hinted at.  There is SOME reason they are so devastated.  There is obviously something good that they are losing, something they wanted.   Or they would just say "I'm well rid of all that nonsense."   Now I'm not trying to speak for them, I'm just asking you to think about the fact that it isn't for nothing that men do not initiate most divorces (and that isn't because of the unjust legal landscape; the average joe isn't usually thinking about that if he really wants a divorce.)   But men less often WANT a divorce.

Now I'm going to tell you why that is, and I'm not saying there is a surfeit of good women available with whom to create a good marriage.  I'm not saying I have any kind of superiority because I found a good wife.   I'm merely trying to describe and explain what so many men are actually seeking...even though so often they end up not getting it.

Proverbs 31 explains it.    After the *mother* admonishes young men NOT to give their *strength* to women, it goes on to explain:

Quote
The Virtuous Wife
   10Who can find a virtuous[c] wife?
      For her worth is far above rubies.
      11The heart of her husband safely trusts her;
      So he will have no lack of gain.
      12She does him good and not evil
      All the days of her life.
      13She seeks wool and flax,
      And willingly works with her hands.
      14She is like the merchant ships,
      She brings her food from afar.
      15She also rises while it is yet night,
      And provides food for her household,
      And a portion for her maidservants.
      16She considers a field and buys it;
      From her profits she plants a vineyard.
      17She girds herself with strength,
      And strengthens her arms.
      18She perceives that her merchandise is good,
      And her lamp does not go out by night.
      19She stretches out her hands to the distaff,
      And her hand holds the spindle.
      20She extends her hand to the poor,
      Yes, she reaches out her hands to the needy.
      21She is not afraid of snow for her household,
      For all her household is clothed with scarlet.
      22She makes tapestry for herself;
      Her clothing is fine linen and purple.
      23Her husband is known in the gates,
      When he sits among the elders of the land.
      24She makes linen garments and sells them,
      And supplies sashes for the merchants.
      25Strength and honor are her clothing;
      She shall rejoice in time to come.
      26She opens her mouth with wisdom,
      And on her tongue is the law of kindness.
      27She watches over the ways of her household,
      And does not eat the bread of idleness.
      28Her children rise up and call her blessed;
      Her husband also, and he praises her:
      29"Many daughters have done well,
      But you excel them all."
      30Charm is deceitful and beauty is passing,
      But a woman who fears the LORD, she shall be praised.
      31Give her of the fruit of her hands,
      And let her own works praise her in the gates.


I will now shut up and let the words speak for themselves, as well as let everyone else do their thing.

typhonblue

Galt, the answer is simple.

Most men have no idea that they should want something other then what a woman wants. Mainly because they have no identity outside of women.

Therefore  the average man simply assumes that since *she* wants the home-baked apple pie, wood shined to an obsessive gloss, every nick-nack in it's place life, that he wants it too.

Whenever a man deviates from what his woman wants, he's reprimanded. Either by pastor, priest, psychologist or Oprah. Any step towards an individual masculine identity (and desires) is severly and roundly scorned and shamed. (I've seen this too many damn times to think differently.)

There is no point arguing with guys who are like this. They never have and never will think beyond the confines of MOTHER.

Galt

I read the Bible completely through once, and I am convinced that the Bible has a lot of wisdom.  I am absolutely convinced of that.

But despite that, and despite the wisdom in Proverbs, there is the idea that women, maybe feminists, maybe some women riding on tne tide of feminism, are using male chivalry and their particular talents to dredge everything they can out of men today.

Just a thought.

SIAM

Quote
But despite that, and despite the wisdom in Proverbs, there is the idea that women, maybe feminists, maybe some women riding on tne tide of feminism, are using male chivalry and their particular talents to dredge everything they can out of men today.


Agreed - and what typhonblue says too  - many men prop up their self-worth via female approval.

For me, as a man,  marriage is a joke - how can somebody possibly take such a foolish risk when it's unnecessary? Also I rarely see truly happily married men - they're frightened or bored or both (bored with their life, but frightened to lose the identity they have).

SouthernGuy

I'm considering it again, God help me...

SG

SIAM

SouthernGuy, why?

PowerMan72

:shock:

NOOOOOOOO!!!
Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan: "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts."

The Gonzman

I a legal sense, marriage is nothing but a pre-arranged contract where you do not get to negotiate the terms, and the enforcement of the obligations thereof will be one sided
Yea, though I walk through the valley of the Shadow of death, I shall fear no evil, for I am the MEANEST son-of-a-bitch in the valley.

Galt

Quote from: "SouthernGuy"
I'm considering it again, God help me...

SG


This is a good time to think through what the situation may be in 5-10 years and to critically assess the woman you are thinking about in terms of morals and the like (long-term actions should be the basis for that assessment, and not words).  Sex in the beginning of a relationship can be a bit blinding in terms of covering up other aspects of the relationship that may be problematic.

bluegrass

Galt-  In my opinion the fact of the matter is that most guys are simply unaware of how bad the legal situation is.  The funny thing is that most of what father's rights activists are fighting for right now are all things that they typical person on the street -- without firsthand knowledge -- already believes is the status quo.

Most people believe "joint custody" is some kind of written law that actually has some meaning, when in fact it is simply a name put on a contractual intention.

Most guys think that joint custody is automatic unless you've done something wrong.

Most guys think that joint custody and parenting time somehow reduce the amount of child support which will be paid -- which it doesn't.

Most guys are completely unaware of facts like the Bradley Amendment and the brutality of the child support enforcement system.

Most guys are unaware that a woman doesn't need a single bit of evidence to get a restraining order to remove him from his home and family.

I know three guys at work right now who are going through all these things and all three are completely shocked at how the standards of the sytem around divorce and child custody are actually set up.

....and in the end, most guys love kids and want families.  They simply don't realize going into it that there is no protection for any rights that they'd consider to be basic.
"To such females, womanhood is more sacrosanct by a thousand times than the Virgin Mary to popes--and motherhood, that degree raised to astronomic power. They have eaten the legend about themselves and believe it; they live it; they require fealty of us all." -- Philip Wylie, Generation of Vipers

Galt

Quote from: "bluegrass"
Most guys are completely unaware of facts like the Bradley Amendment and the brutality of the child support enforcement system.


Here's a blurb I wrote on the Bradley Amendment:

http://www.standyourground.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5102

Most men don't even know that exists.  Reading through the amendment is a very effective form of birth control.

Go Up