Why? Because only I can know what I'm thinking of and you can never be 100% sure. Think about it, I'm free to deny what it is that you are expected to know and replace with another version; while of course at the same time declaring you as an insensitive idiot. Your take on what I have in mind can never amount to more than an educational guess, while naturally, I'm the one with the last say in whatever is occuring in my thoughts. Therefore, whatever is right is whatever I say. You shall always be in the inferior position.
A better description of innate
has seldom been posted here!
Ironic that for the feminist proponents of Gender War, "among the causes of passive-aggression is fear of conflict!"
Does using the term innate
here require a banning?
(Webster's def.) -- "belonging to the essential nature of something..."
Though I'm confident that in our P.C. climate, anyone at anytime of any age, gender, ethnicity, or class can opt out by saying ---- "But I'm not like that!"
It's too bad that the proponents of VAWA 2005 believe that we all believe in INNATE theories....
They have basically three categories for us:
1) Victims (women and children)
2) Oppressors (men)
3) Misguided Non-believers (women who like men; men who like women; children who just want a dad and mom...)