NCB,
The child support issue is sick, but equally whacked is that these ADMITTED child molestors are granted and affirmed custody.
Would a MAN who admitted that he had sex with a 12-14 year old girl, and who somehow gained custody, RETAIN custody after admitting to these molestations? Would the girl be forced, under penalty of prison (the ONLY form of "debtor's prison" in the U.S. is for child support), to pay her RAPIST?
Consider that in N.J., the state Supreme Court has codified this into law. A boy was molested at 14. Not only molested, but RAPED. He was given alcohol to lower his inhibitions (what feminists call rape) and even though he kept saying "no, I don't want to do this" the woman got on top, and enveloped him.
(from memory) 10 years later she and her then husband divorced. He had a DNA test, the child was not his. He was not ordered to pay child support. So what did Miss Molestor/Rapist do? She ADMITTED in court to molested (raping) the 14 y.o., and asked for child support. Was she stripped of custody? Lol, Goddess forbid. No, she retained custody, and the court (and then the appeals court, and the N.J. Supreme Court upheld) that she retain custody and that her victim pay child support.
Did HE get custody? Lordy, no, why should he? He's just the sperm donar and it's a "non-issue" that her MALE CHILD is coming up on the same age of her original victim.
What you DON'T hear from feminist groups ought to shock and anger you NCB.
Steven