Why...WHY does anyone give a shit what either of them say? You're reading Swedeish furniture assembly manuals.
Aman's OW! sword!
was a pile of shit until she shacked up with a mans (yet another "I'll bet they......!")
website (her rolodex was manditory) . Her sole reason for being is to piss off men. I'ts a blog-who cares? Don't play with her and her only audience will be whoever links there from feministing. Let it go! You're rolling with young swine when you encourage them.
I've tried to give Hboy a break but it's apparrent that he's just as lame as any other young academic that can't seem to make an informed stand on anything, so he wears different hats among young or otherwise unworldly saps that are
suseptable to his self serving proclaimatiions. Tell them they're pretty!Jim Jones and David Koresh(sp)would be proud! guess what-he wants access to Aman's usefull idiots!(which take the express train from Jessys) Aman' desperately needs more than three crosslinks that actually do. They both starve for this symbiosis. High school chat room fodder is back on the menu after labor day.
In the mean time, don't reward the beasts with referance unless they say something...ANYTHING...worth note. I am certainly
guilty of falling into the trap myself. I run with the ideal that ooughtright bullshit needs to be immediately stepped on as hard as a kick start 'scooter. Let me add ManhattenM and the kind folks at iF i'm in to this concept.
These are all folks worth viewing now and again, but when there's no-one jumping in to call them on their crap-providing the continued projection screen, the responses dry up faster than piss in a hair drier and they go out knocking.
There is certainly something to be said about keeping any drivel cloistered in their own backyards, but after the smackdowns, walk away. Anything else is a waste of assets that could be used to take issues discussed at SYG to a higher level.
But that's just me.
I see no problem citing aheads up
withthe goings on where the dung beetles feed, but try to remember, don't let the "quaint ones" rile you any more than you find them credible, 'cus in the big picture, it don't mean shinola.
I'm going to take unusual (for me) liberty and suggest the following:
Hugo decided that Amanda has the modern man nailed vis-a-vis why women have such a hard time finding a good one. If you're bored, see here, and then follow the link.. As usual, they are amusingly misinformed.Crazy antics ensue....
This has got everything in it. Hugo's predictable self-important lecturing on"howitisallmensfaultandthereforemenmust changeandwomenarejustfinethewaytheyareaslongastheyarefeminsts!" (a small town in Sweden?) Amanda? Well, *pfft* you know, same ol' Amanda.
If either of them had a half-dozen brain cells between the two of them, narcissistic prattle would be a step forward.
They're nostalgicly cute, in a lighting your own farts kind of way.
This is NOT to impose my sarcasm/sardonic style on your plaint. Obviously I understand the rant, I understand the impatience. This was just an attempt to show how little effort the situation truly merits.