http://mensnewsdaily.com/blog/mentalk/2006...eged-blair.htmlThursday, January 19, 2006
Official Statement From Alleged Blair Kidnap Plotter
I, Martin Matthews, would like to make a few things clear about the Sun newspaper article about kidnapping Leo Blair.
1. At no time did anyone ever suggest anything of the sort.
2. The following people were present, Artur - a 58-year-old father who is 'T -Total,' Dyian, A photography teacher who also did not drink as he later went to work, Gary, Jolly, Graham, Eddie, and two women.
3. After speaking with the Daily Mail, Sun and Daily Mirror, I feel it necessary to point the following:-
On the 18th of December 2005, I was feeling unwell and only had two glasses of Coke in the pub. I do not have the slightest idea from where these roomers of a kidnapping came from. I have noted in the tabloids that Jolly Sainsbury and Graham Manson are quoted as saying, that I may have suggested this as a joke. However, after speaking with Jolly and Graham it must be made clear that they have been miss-quoted.
4. I found yesterday exhausting, as I had made it clear to the tabloids exactly what the position was. However, I find that in today's papers have reported that a conversation had taken place with fact or evidence to support this.
5. Late last night and early this morning I was approached by a 3rd party offering me £10,000 from the Sun Newspaper to lie and admit that the kidnapping plot was a Matt O'Conner idea and that he had asked me to look into it for the group.
6. I would like to thank Matt O'Conner for everything he has done for us and suggest that he should be included in the next honours list.
7. I did meet with Police Officers in Epsom on the 27th of December 2005. However, I find it particularly strange that if I did in fact suggest or take part in any kidnap plot on the 18th last, the police have not ever questioned me about this. In fact when I telephoned the Police Officer who spoke to me on the 27th last, about the Sun Newspaper article, and asked him directly who was involved he could not give me any information.
8. I am of the opinion that the entire saga is a complete fabrication by someone in power and ask most loudly that proof or evidence should be made available for public scrutiny.
9. As I am not a politician and have no experience with such matters all I can say is the only Party to benefit from this saga would be the Labour Party, by taking the heat of Ruth Kelly and off the front page of the newspapers.
Regards,
Martin Matthews
--------------
It was only a few months ago sun editor Rebekah Wade, was arrested for assaulting her actor husband Ross Kemp. Once again the fervent feminist is embroiled in yet another headline story of her own making, whereby it seems as editor the likely paper-trail will lead back to her - hopefully.
Ms Wade should have lost her position as editor of the sun when she attacked her husband, instead of receiving a rapturous standing ovation when she returned to the sun office. Mr O'Connor at this stage must press the authorities to engage in a official investigation into the activities of the sun newspaper, to which it seem's a myriad of crimes have been commited.
Also Matt O'Connor does not have the sole power to disband F4J. He has access to his children now and has made a worthy contribution to F4J. However, just because by his own admission he is tired and fed up, does not change the pain and suffering of thousands of fathers seperated from their children.
The title "fathers for justice" is ubiquitous and no one person can claim sole ownership of it. For me I believe any man separated from his child/ren automatically entitles you to it. The name has been adopted by a growing number of countries, who haven't engaged in a business franchise transaction with F4J UK to secure use of the name - is proof in point. Like any good "uprising" having a sole central command is not good sound strategy.
The movement will continue unabated with great gusto, of that I can assure you!
Below is an extract regarding Ms Wade and her true feelings about men in general.
Christina Odone in the Observer ...
Rebekah's rough side ...
I did, however, get a hint that appearances were deceptive a few days later when I was in a car on my way to a TV studio. The driver told me he often ferried Wade and some friends on regular, women-only nights out on the town. What had shocked the man behind the wheel was the barrage of four-letter words and anti-men jokes that reached him from the back seat. He couldn't understand the male-bashing; these were good-looking, high-earning women who had men at their feet. In Wade's case, it would seem, this is precisely how she likes them.