Ultimately men don't need more of WOMAN, they need eachother. Even pro-MRA women get stuck on that one.
Not necessarily. Many of us feel that men can be there for each other without the requirement, which you seem to promote, that they be gay to do so.
Beene sent a photo which showed two men in army gear, each with a hand on the back of the other's neck, their foreheads together. That to me is a wonderful example of men being able to be intimate, and it most likely was two heterosexual men.
I see that most men are not nor ever will be comfortable being gay, but we can encourage men to be more intimate. I see your fascination with gay men to be counterproductive in the movement, in that many men, out of self preservation, will stay away from intimacy because it is so often related to homosexuality.
Boundaries often serve purposes other then nefarious ones. Making it clear one is not gay keeps men from being hit on by other men. It can be very uncomfortable, for both men, when that happens. Pretending it is all the fault of a phobic society is not addressing that problem. I see value in much of what you discuss, but I feel you promote homosexuality over heterosexuality.
Quite frankly, I have little agenda on this as I am happily married. As long as MY husband is faithful to me, I really would not care if the entire men's movement was made up of gays. Since it is not, however, I care about helping who does make up the men's movement, which is by and large straight men.
