Prostitution: A Contemporary Form of Slavery

Started by Rob, Apr 02, 2006, 09:20 AM

previous topic - next topic
Go Down

Rob

Rather than wasting your Sunday Morning doing something like a crossword puzzle, I challenge you to a new game - find how many sentences in the following article (a presentation to the United Nations) that you can actually agree with.

http://action.web.ca/home/catw/readingroom.shtml?x=16727&AA_EX_Session=8045a73f84bcd45052cf0d018c3d4649

Prostitution: A Contempory Form of Slavery - CATW presentation to the United Nations Working Group on Contemporary Forms of Slavery
Author(s): Dorchen Leidholdt, Co-Executive Director of CATW

The Coalition is an international non-governmental organization with regional headquarters and networks in Asia, Latin America, North America, Europe, Africa, and Australia. The Coalition works against all practices of sexual violence and exploitation, including but not limited to rape, incest, intimate violence, prostitution, sex trafficking, sex tourism, mail order bride markets, sexual harassment, pornography, involuntary sterilization and childbearing, female genital mutilation, and temporary marriage or marriage of convenience for the purpose of sexual exploitation.


The focus of our work is on sexual exploitation, which we define as the sexual violation of a person's human dignity, equality, and physical or mental integrity and as a practice by which some people (primarily men) achieve power and domination over others (primarily women and children) for the purpose of sexual gratification, financial gain, and/or advancement. The Coalition recognizes that, in order to carry out their practices and achieve their goals, sexual exploiters are facilitated by and make use of long standing social hierarchies, especially the domination of men over women, of adults over children, of rich over poor, of racial and ethnic majorities over racial and ethnic minorities, and of and so called "First World "over so-called "Third World" countries.


We believe that all of the practices I have just described are proper areas of inquiry for the Working Group on Contemporary Forms of Slavery. We define slavery as the domination and control by an individual or group over other individuals or groups through violence, the threat of violence, or a history of violence. Slavers are motivated by a desire for sexual gratification, economic gain, or power and domination, or a combination of these factors. We reference the definition of slavery in the Convention on Slavery, Forced Labor, and Similar Institutions and Practices: "Slavery is the status or condition of a person over whom any or all of the powers attaching to the right of ownership are exercised." All of the practices addressed by the Coalition emerge from the historical reality of the chattel status of women and children and represent an attempt to revive and maintain it. Moreover, as Professor Bales pointed out, unlike traditional forms of slave ownership in which the person enslaved was regarded as a capital investment, to be maintained and guarded over a long period of time, contemporary forms of slavery often reflect a valuation of the enslaved as a temporary, disposable commodity, to be consumed and discarded.


For example, prostitution, in the vast majority of cases, represents the ownership of women and children by pimps, brothel owners, and sometimes even customers for the purpose of financial gain, sexual gratification, and/or power and domination. Of those women who appear to work in prostitution voluntarily, many if not most endured situations of enslavement as children, in thrall to sexually abusive adults, or as adolescents or young women subjected to the violent subjugation of abusive husbands or boyfriends. That subjugation is continued in prostitution, whether over the long term by the pimp, who controls her every movement and confiscates her earnings, or, for a shorter duration by the customer, who buys her body for a night or week and requires total compliance with his sexual demands. Female genital mutilation, though not a form of slavery in itself, is closely tied to slavery-like practices: it is a method by which a male dominated society ensures the subordination of women and girls to their fathers and husbands; it is a strategy to destroy a woman's experience of her sexuality and thus the ownership of her body.


The Coalition urges the Working Group on Contemporary Forms of Slavery to encourage research and study on the way these different practices work together, albeit differently in different cultures, to perpetuate the chattel status of women and children. The Coalition also urges the Working Group to continue to address slavery and slavery-like practices that affect primarily women and children. The Coalition notes that the practices of slavery affecting these groups may be characterized by different forms, dynamics, and motivations from the practices of slavery directly primarily against men for purposes of forced labor. Any definition of slavery that excludes those practices directed against women and children is overly narrow and is a product of gender bias.


The subject of my remarks concerns the context into which we place and understand the trafficking of women and girls for the purposes of sexual exploitation. Over the last five years, many organizations have addressed the issue of trafficking in women but ignored its relationship to other practices of sexual violence and exploitation, specifically sex tourism, military prostitution, sexual exploitation on the internet, and organized prostitution. Similar distinctions have been made between adult and child sexual exploitation and between so-called forced and so-called voluntary prostitution. Although there are many motivations for making these distinctions, the cumulative effect is organizing efforts and analyses that address only the most severe and obvious abuses while ignoring the institutionalized sexual exploitation and abuse that is the economic foundation of the sex industry. Although these distinctions are sometimes made in the name of the victim, in fact they serve to protect the industry and its customers at the expense of the victim.


The first distinction that is made is that between sex trafficking and other practices of sexual exploitation, most notably organized prostitution. This is a distinction that the drafters of the 1949 Convention considered and rejected, uniting in both title and text the trafficking in persons with the exploitation of the prostitution of others. The connections between trafficking and organized prostitution, evident in 1949, are even more pronounced in the global sex industry of 1998. The fact is that organized prostitution is the economic and structural foundation of sex trafficking. Although it is not often recognized, many of the women and girls who are trafficked start out being prostituted to local men by local pimps and brothel owners. Often when they are deported back to their countries of origin, they are prostituted again, locally. Coalition representatives have met with many such women during site visits to the Philippines and Thailand. The survivor of sex trafficking who testified before the United Nations General Assembly in 1996 started out in child prostitution in Puerto Rico before being trafficked through Honduras, only to end up back in prostitution in the United States. Sex tourism, a form of prostitution controlled by local or global economic interests, is often the launching pad for sex trafficking, but is not considered such as it involves sexual exploitation of local women in their country of origin.


The fact is that sex trafficking and organized prostitution are inextricably connected and share fundamental characteristics. The victims who are targeted are the same--poor, minority, or so-called Third World women and children, frequently with histories of physical and sexual abuse. The customers are the same-- men with disposable income who achieve sexual gratification by purchasing and invading the body of a woman or child. The dynamics of power and control employed by the sex industry profiteers are the same, whether they take the form of violence and threats of violence, debt bondage, torture, imprisonment, and/or brainwashing. The harm to the victims is the same--trauma, sexually transmitted diseases, drug and alcohol addiction, the physical toll of repeated beatings by customers and pimps, the psychological and physical toll of repeated and unwanted sex, and the destruction of the sense of self, identity, and sexuality. The harm to society is the same--the reification of sex- and race-based hierarchies. Whether they purchase women who are trafficked or those who are otherwise prostituted, sex industry consumers move from the brothel into the world, that experience coloring their relations to women and girls in the rest society. Some American men stationed in South East Asia during the Vietnam War have talked about how their immersion in military prostitution profoundly damaged their ability to relate to women and girls back home. A few former sex industry consumers, who have become leaders in the movement against sexual exploitation, have discussed similar effects of participating as customers of the sex trade. Certainly, the injuries to their sense of self and sexuality are mild compared to those of the young women who are reduced to sexual merchandise by the industry. Nevertheless, we must acknowledge that the sex industry also harms men, impairing their ability to experience sexual relations that are premised on mutual respect and equality.


The second distinction that is frequently made, to the detriment of victims and the benefit of the sex industry, is that between the sexual exploitation of children and of adults. The problem with this position is that by failing to criticize the sexual exploitation of adults, it legitimizes it. For example, to decry the prostitution of a fifteen year old girl but to fail to speak out against the prostitution of her seventeen year old sister is to tacitly sanction the sexual exploitation of the older girl. Many organizations have organized to end the sexual exploitation of children, a laudable goal, but have failed to see that the sexual exploitation of children is inextricably connected to that of adults. Studies show that in the West, at least 70 percent of the adults exploited by the sex industry were sexually abused as children. They also show that the average age of entry into prostitution is 16 or younger. It is clear that the sexually exploited children of today are the prostituted adults of tomorrow, and, as the French abolitionist organization, Le Nid, declares, "In every whore, there is a little girl murdered. "Although some sex industry consumers are fixated on sex with young children, many sexually exploit young girls and young women interchangeably. We will not be able to end the sexual exploitation of children until we take a stand and develop strategies against sexual exploitation of all human beings.


The third and most problematic distinction that has recently emerged is that between so called forced and so called voluntary prostitution. By limiting the pool of people who can be identified as victims while simultaneously protecting large segments of the sex industry, this is the best gift that pimps and traffickers could have received. This distinction creates a vision of prostitution that is freely chosen; a vision that can be maintained only by ignoring all of the social conditions that force women and girls into conditions of sexual exploitation. The proponents of this distinction are sending the following message: "Don't pay attention to the poverty, the familial pressure, the incest she survived, the battering by her boyfriend, the lack of employment options available to her. Just ask whether there is a gun pointed at her head or whether she is being overtly deceived. No gun, no deceit; then no problem; not only is she voluntarily in the sex industry, she is a 'sex worker.'" Under this analysis, the pimp who recruited her, the brothel owner who reaps profits by selling her to sex tourists, and the trafficker who sends her abroad are rehabilitated as so-called "third-party managers."


What are the consequences of conceptualizing prostitution as free or forced, and the legitimization of prostitution as "sex work" that inevitably follows? There are many. First, governments, especially those of poor countries, realize that they can reduce their unemployment rate and increase their gross national product by moving unemployed women and girls into organized prostitution. This is most likely to happen in countries with strong internal sex industries fueled by the profits of sex tourists. In Belize, for example, the government touts prostitution as work for poor women. Not only does it feel no shame at doing so, but proudly reports on this approach in its 1996 report to CEDAW, stating, "Recognized prostitution in Belize is a gender-specific form of migrant labor that serves the same economic function for women as agricultural work offers to men and often for better pay." When governments recognizes prostitution as sex work for poor women, organized prostitution, sex tourism and sex trafficking increase.


Second, when prostitution is accepted by a society as sex work, it becomes even more difficult for poor women and girls, socialized into an ethos of self-sacrifice, to resist economic and familial pressures to enter prostitution. As the numbers of prostituted women and girls expand, growing numbers become infected with HIV and die of AIDS while a smaller but still significant percentage are murdered by pimps or customers. Those women fortunate enough to survive sexual exploitation emerge, usually in their 30's, when they are no longer marketable commodities, with no job skills, traumatized from years of enduring unwanted sex and violence, and physically debilitated from sexually transmitted diseases and the substance abuse necessary to endure the sex of prostitution. What is available to these women? Destitution or a career as a madam or mama san, helping the pimps control the younger women who are marketable commodities.


Third, when prostitution is recognized as "sex work," legalization follows; pimps, sex industry cartels, and sex businesses openly flourish, regulated only by the demands of the marketplace. Fourth, when prostitution is legitimized as sex work, men and boys are sent the message that purchasing the body of a woman or girl for sex is no different from buying a pack of cigarettes. With no social stigma attached to buying prostitutes, the demand for prostitution escalates. At the same time, women and girls internalize the message that the female body is a marketable commodity. Girls begin to see prostitution as a career option, unaware that sex work is a trap that will deprive them of control over their lives..Fifth, when prostitution is legitimized as sex work, the values and dynamics of prostitution spill over into other areas of society, influencing the valuation and treatment of women and girls and lowering their status.


Some have argued that since criminal sanctions have clearly not slowed the growth of the sex industry or lessened the exploitation of victims, the only recourse is to recognize prostitution as sex work and legalize the sex industry. Criminal sanctions have not worked it is true, but that is because in most instances they have been directed against the victims. Few countries invest law enforcement resources in the investigation and prosecution of sex industry profiteers and fewer still address criminal sanctions against the customers, who fuel the demand side of the industry. And while some countries have conducted effective and well funded campaigns against domestic violence and rape, building networks of shelters for victims and offering counseling and legal services, women and girls in conditions of sexual exploitation have been deprived of the support systems and advocacy provided other victims of male violence.


To begin to address the enslavement of women and girls by local and global sex industries, we must take the following steps:


Recognize that sex trafficking, sex tourism, military prostitution, sexual exploitation on the internet, and organized prostitution are interrelated practices of gender-based domination and control that constitute contemporary forms of slavery.


Commission a preparatory group to address the need for an optional protocol to strengthen the application of the 1949 Convention and explore the need for a new Convention Against All Forms of Sexual Exploitation.


Call for local, national, regional, and international law enforcement strategies that depenalize the victims of sexual exploitation while penalizing sex industry profiteers and customers.


Urge countries to expand and develop shelters and counseling services, medical care providers, and legal services for all victims of male violence against women, including sex industry victims and survivors.

---

Rob's comment:

Of course, I would like to personally thank the author, Dorchen Leidholdt, for acknowledging that men are victims too:  

"Nevertheless, we must acknowledge that the sex industry also harms men, impairing their ability to experience sexual relations that are premised on mutual respect and equality."

As if somehow Dorchen Leidholdt has displayed any knowledge of mutual respect and equality.

ThePatriarch

Sounds like Marxist analysis.  

This isn't exactly a sentence:

"Author(s): Dorchen Leidholdt, Co-Executive Director of CATW "  But I guess it might be true.  So let's say I agree with one sentence.

Virtue

Scare tactics that stir up emotional response that gets votes.....in other words complete BS.
Imagine waking up tomorrow to find
that unbelievably rape is now legal.

You would be freaking out, telling everyone you ran into this is crazy- something needs to be done... now!!! And then every man you told this to just very smugly and condescendingly says...

"Hey... not all men are 'like that.'"

sorryisntgoodenough

Man I can't wait until I get my brothel licencse so I can spend all day refuting these people in the line of duty.  I'm gonna e-mail this to my friend who is a hooker in Montreal, she's gonna be laughing the rest of the day.  Laws that criminalize selling pussy hurt women a lot more than anyone else.

sorryisntgoodenough

I've been around a lot of prostitution in Europe, Canada, and Latin America, and I swear, scouts honor, I"ve never seen anyone, man or woman, who looked like they were doing something against their will, or who looked like they were "stuck" in the business.  They all wanted to be there.  When prostitution is criminalized, drugs and ne'er do wells seep into the landscape, and that is how people get forced into doing it, or the "sex slaves" as this article refers to.

LibertyUNH

I believe that women who sell sex at <$100 in US ARE being exploited.  If prostitution was legal with a minimal wage requirement of $300/sex and $1200/night in USA it would be very benificial to both prostitutes and men but DETRIMENTAL to women interested in keeping men as slaves.

An average sex worker has 800 clients a year.  With an average of $400 per sex she can easily make $320K a year.

sorryisntgoodenough

I agree with some of what you say UNH, but not all.  In Prague, you can get sex with a woman for about $65 USD, the same service in the USA would cost at least $1000, if you can even find an American woman who even comes close in sex appeal to a Czech woman, good luck.  In Canada, my friend charges  $300CAD(268USD) for sex.  I think that is a little steep, when you consider they are not being taxed, and when you consider that a woman in Poland had sex over 700 times in a day, just to prove it could be done.  Between 100-200 USD is fair wage for sex, which usually lasts 45 minutes at the most.  $1200 for a night is insane.  $500 is fair.

JoeFin

Excuse me!!

They are being forced... Oh let me rephrase that... COERCED economically to toe the Bush/Evangelical line of thinking towards prostitution.

Here are some excerpts from the article

Quote
Overall, the Bush administration has devoted more than $295 million in anti-trafficking program assistance in more than 120 countries, according to the State Department. More than 2,800 people around the world have been convicted of trafficking-related crimes in the past three years, and 24 countries have enacted new anti-trafficking legislation. One of George W. Bush's favorite U.S. programs is the International Justice Mission (IJM), which is run by Gary Haugen, 41, author of Good News About Injustice, and Sharon Cohn, 34, the organization's vice president of interventions, who has overseen brothel raids in Cambodia.

The movement's most prominent figures include right-wing policy-makers, a Jewish "moral entrepreneur," and evangelical leaders, whom critics call overzealous and moralistic. Together, the "abolitionists" have formed a potent political force ("It's the most powerful coalition for human rights in America today -- perhaps in the world -- all under the radar screen of the press," says one of its adherents) known for steamrolling opponents and stifling dissenting voices

Last year, Horowitz, Colson, and others decided to oust Miller's predecessor, Nancy Ely-Raphael

Regardless of Ely-Raphael's taste in shoes, Horowitz, Colson, and other evangelical leaders told the White House to dump her. They wanted to install Miller

In a show of strength, Horowitz and Colson prevailed over Rove, who allowed them to anoint Miller as director of what would soon become the "abolitionist" outpost in the State Department

Bush's focus on trafficking is a victory for Horowitz and evangelical leaders in their efforts to influence U.S. foreign policy.

In terms of scope, financial resources, and the president's attention, though, the anti-trafficking initiative may be the "abolitionists'" crowning achievement. The campaign took off in January 1998, when Horowitz began to forge bonds with evangelical leaders like Colson and feminists such as Gloria Steinem and Jessica Neuwirth of Equality Now. They all worked together on a global campaign to fight trafficking and, along with it, prostitution.

And many anti-trafficking leaders have been shunned because they've refused to sign a contract that supports the Bush administration's position.

http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&name=ViewPrint&articleId=8763
Resident Sh!! house attorney at large

PowerMan72

Quote
LibertyUNH wrote:

I believe that women who sell sex at <$100 in US ARE  being exploited. If prostitution was legal with a minimal wage requirement of $300/sex and $1200/night in USA it would be very benificial to both prostitutes and men but DETRIMENTAL to women interested in keeping men as slaves.

An average sex worker has 800 clients a year. With an average of $400 per sex she can easily make $320K a year.


As with anything else, the law of supply and demand rules.  I am sure that the hookers around here would love to charge those rates.  Some of the new ones do try.  I've kicked more than a couple out of my car for quoting ridiculously high prices.  Eventually though, they figure out that none of the guys are willing to pay that much and they have to either lower their rates or find a new line of work.  A day or two on the stroll with no customers will work wonders for a girl's attitude.
Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan: "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts."

johnnyp

Quote from: "LibertyUNH"
I believe that women who sell sex at <$100 in US ARE being exploited.  If prostitution was legal with a minimal wage requirement of $300/sex and $1200/night in USA it would be very benificial to both prostitutes and men but DETRIMENTAL to women interested in keeping men as slaves.



Do you have any reasoning behind the pricing scheme?

Prostitution is a no skill job with no experience requirements.  Women could easily do it on part-time or as needed basis to supplement income.  I would equate prostitution to unskilled laborers who earn $17,000 a year.  

Your numbers lead to $150,000 = 2 customers x 250 working days per year x $300.  That is a crazy amount of money!

$150,000 per year is three to four times the median family income!

It seems to me you are putting some huge underserved premium one a woman's unskilled labor.  Every day men due dangerous and dirty unskilled work for a few dollars per hour.
 woman needs a man like a fish needs water

PowerMan72

:yes:

Yeah, that pricing scheme is just way over the top.
Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan: "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts."

johnnyp

Quote from: "PowerMan72"
:yes:

Yeah, that pricing scheme is just way over the top.


Probably some mysterious chivalry multiplier
 woman needs a man like a fish needs water

Sir Percy

Jesus wept. I am getting heartily sick of this. There are some people in the MRM that I would put in the vanguard of any battle, just to see them get speared so the rest of us could get on with something useful.
vil, like misery, is Protean, and never greater than when committed in the name of 'right'. To commit evil when they are convinced they are doing 'good', is one of the greatest of pleasures known to a feminist.

sorryisntgoodenough

Jesus wept. I am getting heartily sick of this. There are some people in the MRM that I would put in the vanguard of any battle, just to see them get speared so the rest of us could get on with something useful.


bahh...get over it.  Guys like babbling about economics.  Since I now know it annoys you...

A streetwalker is entitled to charge a bit more because they can provide added intimacy, and they are doing more work than a conventional escort.  They have to actively build and maintain their own client base to stay afloat economically.  Part of the duties implicit in their job is liason work with taxi drivers and hotel managers.  Seeing a real pro in action making all these factors come together at the seams can be like watching a surgeon or stunt pilot in action.  So $300 would be the max for them.  An escort who works for an agency has someone else doing their leg work for them, so they don't merit as much.  Exotic dancers are the lowest rung, usually using low rent shame tactics to get you to spend as much money as possible for doing nothing.

SIAM

In other news, McDonalds workers are forced to work in restaurants for little pay because people want to eat hamburgers.

Oh, and gasoline attendants are poorly paid and forced to work in gas stations because people need gas.

Supply/demand.  Economics.

Nobody is forcing people to offer a supply to a demand.  We are free spirits.  We have personal responsibility (unless we're feminists).  We choose our life.  We choose our circumstances when it comes to what work we do.

Human trafficking is a total red herring - irrelevant to 99% of prostitutes. Most prostitutes actively choose their career.  What have feminists got to say to them?

(and I'd venture that most people "trafficked" know full well what trade they're going into)

Go Up