Our Lady Phyllis writes... President's knees go weak...

[johnnyp]

http://www.townhall.com/opinion/columns/phyllisschlafly/2006/04/17/193980.html

Assistant Education Secretary for Civil Rights Stephanie Monroe has announced that the administration of President George W. Bush is investigating universities that have fewer women in science and math programs than feminists would like. We are more than five years into the Bush presidency, but it appears that former President Bill Clinton's feminist policies are still in force.

Is Bush a feminist, or is he just a gentleman who is intimidated by feminists and unable to cope with their unreasonable demands, tantrums and rudeness? When it comes to public policy and personnel appointments, the result is the same.

The gender police have already ruined college sports for many men, forcing the senseless elimination of 171 wrestling teams to reduce the overall proportion of men to women on college athletic teams. Fresh from that attack on masculinity, the new target is math and science departments.

[Men's Rights Activist]

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4492617
Laura Bush: Putting Boys in the Spotlight

"President Bush has tapped Laura Bush to lead an effort to help boys do better in school and stay away from street gangs and crime -- a response to grim statistics on the difficulties boys face. "

and

http://www.washingtontimes.com/specialreport/20060122-120546-2696r.htm
Academic underachievers

"First lady Laura Bush and a growing number of physicians, educators and psychologists say Americans need to wake up and see that boys lag far behind girls in school, and then demand that something be done.
   Mrs. Bush, mother of two grown daughters, speaks at conferences and in interviews about the declining status of boys in today's learning environment. She has charged that boys are being overlooked."

Where's that spotlight?  My God, the darkness is blinding!

[SecondToDie]

The only difference between the Democrats and the Republicans is that the Democrats are at least honest about their political views.  They admit they support social engineering, feminism, centralization, and big government.  Republicans attack those every two years, then when they are elected they proceed to carry out the goals of their opponents.  Bush's support for using Title IX for social engineering is a good example of this.

[Virtue]

I will not vote for any politician that will not work to restore personal liberty, and return sanity, logic and reason to our laws.....Guess I wont be voting any time soon.

[SecondToDie]

I will not vote for any politician that will not work to restore personal liberty, and return sanity, logic and reason to our laws.....Guess I wont be voting any time soon.

National Libertarian Party

[Virtue]

Yeah but they have their issues also.....they are definatly closest to the mark tho.

[Hombre]

I will not vote for any politician that will not work to restore personal liberty, and return sanity, logic and reason to our laws.....Guess I wont be voting any time soon.

National Libertarian Party

If their economic policies weren't the fastest way to turn most Americans into slaves, I'd probably support them. Seriously, if they really believe in economic anarchy, why were they trying to get all of them to move to New Hampshire? Why not Mexico instead, where there hasn't been any regulations of the economy for decades?

[JoeFin]

We really we can't blame any of the political parties out there. We don't have any one speaking up for MRM calling the offices asking them how they are going to vote on any issues. Until we have a group knocking on doors and taking names of who is voting for what we are a victim of the feminist agenda.

Would be nice to see MRM develop a voting record summary of all the politicians. Radar has been doing a fine job of posting alerts but obviously more work needs to be done

As for parties, I'll remain an issues voter