Subscriber Services Complete Forecast
Search Recent News Archives Web for Welcome Guest
Sign Up | Sign In | Member Benefits
Philly.com
Today's Inquirer
Today's Daily News
City & Local News
Sports
YO! Features
Opinion
Columnists
National News
Obituaries
Back to Home > Thursday, May 25, 2006
Posted on Wed, May. 24, 2006email thisprint thisLetters | Getting called on editorialRE YOUR editorial "It's all a (phone) numbers game."
You say, "It's 10 o'clock, do you know where your phone records are?" Then you proceed on one of the most naive rants I've ever read.
Let me ask you a simple question. How many times has a federal official or agent called your home at dinnertime in the last 10 years? I would venture to say not once.
Now, let me ask a follow-up: How many times has a telemarketer called you in the evening? I would guess countless times in the last 10 years.
And where do you think telemarketers "mined" your phone number? I'll answer that: The sources are immeasurable. They can Google your number (and even Google a real-time satellite image of your home). They can just go to the nearest white pages. They also purchase phone numbers from multiple sources.
Jerry Komar
Collingswood, N.J.
Mutilation isn't funny
Dana DiFilippo needs to be chastised for her "funny" account of the Philadelphia man sexually mutilated by his wife.
This man has already been attacked in a way few people will ever experience, but that's not enough for your writer - now he must read about it through the pseudo- journalistic eyes of someone who thinks she has a sense of humor. She actually interview- ed this poor person, and then betrayed him by repeatedly making light of his horror.
Let's turn this around: If a man had ripped his wife's breasts off with his bare hands, would your writer have turned out a similar story? If a man mutilated his wife's vagina, would there be a double entendre on the cover?
Would you, the Daily News, dare to print any of that? If not - and I hope not - then how is this any different?
Brian Gillin
Broomall