Army ‘ahead of society’ in addressing abuse

Started by blackmanx, Jun 02, 2006, 12:43 PM

previous topic - next topic
Go Down

blackmanx

Army 'ahead of society' in addressing abuse

By CONNIE SMALLS
CASEMATE EDITOR

The bright purple bruises on his upper arm were in sharp contrast to the faded yellow ones. The short sleeves on his brown T-shirt just barely covered the remnants of the previous night's fight. His BDU collar couldn't hide the long, crimson, raised marks from her nails that stretched from the left side of his neck to under his chin.

Repeated arguments with his wife had escalated to frequent physical confrontations. People were noticing. How could he continue to deflect the repeated questions from fellow soldiers when asked about the marks? How could he continue to deflect her punches?

The above situation sounds like a scene from a movie, but it's actually played out in real life, and in the military. Male spouse abuse is a continuing problem, according to family counseling experts.

The number of "initial substantiated*" male spouse abuse victims on active duty in the Army was more than three times the number of active-duty female spouse abuse victims in FY94, but that number has decreased steadily over the last decade, Eva Granville, Fort Monroe Family Advocacy Office, said.

The Army's and TRADOC's statistics follow the same pattern, showing a decline in spouse abuse victims over the past decade. Although in most years since FY94 active duty male spouse abuse victims outnumber female victims two to one.

"Male soldiers in abusive relationships don't see themselves as abused (in the same sense that women do)," Mary Stahlman, a social worker with McDonald Army Community Hospital, Fort Eustis, said. "Fortunately, the military is aware of the problem and is taking steps to correct it."

Counseling services are provided through the family advocacy office of Army Community Service at most installations. Monroe has a low caseload (for male spouse abuse), said Stahlman, but those kinds of cases here and at Forts Eustis and Story have one thing in common -- the soldiers aren't volunteering for help.

It's usually someone in the chain of command that sees the problem, she said.

"They (the command) see the bruises ... they want help to resolve the situation. I don't think I've had a soldier walk in himself and say 'I'm being abused by my wife.' Every male soldier that's been in my office has been initially identified by his command."

There are two types of male victims that the military refers (for counseling) most often, Stahlman said.

"In one case, men are being abused by women and are not fighting back -- they have been taught to never hit a woman. But their spouses have not been raised to avoid physical violence, and they are becoming physical.

"The second kind of case is where both partners are striking the other and the abuse is mutual," she said.

"I think what the military is seeing generally, is more cases where the husband and wife are being abusive to each other," she said. "Although I do have cases of male spouse abuse where there is no aggressiveness on the part of the man."

Stahlman sees women's increasing aggressiveness as a cultural shift.

Culture also affects the way men perceive themselves in an abusive relationship.
"In order for a soldier to say, 'Yes, I'm an abuse victim' -- that's going against everything in his culture. Not just his Army culture, but culture generally.

"It's not socially acceptable in our culture to say 'My wife is beating me up.' That's why I say the Army is ahead of society in addressing the issue, because the Army is willing to recognize that (male spouse abuse) exists, and they are willing to take steps to do something about it. But it's the Army institution initiating action, not the individual victims," Stahlman said.

The individuals in the Army, who are being abused, are responding the way they would in our general culture, which is to simply disbelieve it, she said.

"They might say, 'Yes, my wife hits me, but I don't call it abuse.' They certainly don't believe it is. They look at the difference in size between themselves and their wives; they look at the level of injury, and they feel ... men are taught not to make a fuss about being hurt."

So, how do family advocacy counselors like Stahlman get male soldiers to confront physically violent marital situations?

"Generally speaking, a man who comes in who has been physically abused by his wife is not at all happy about the situation, and he feels stuck about how to resolve it," she said.

"He's been taught contradictory messages: first, 'defend yourself from physical assault, and second, 'don't hit a woman.' A woman is hitting him. He doesn't like it and doesn't know how to get it to stop without physically responding.

"Abused men are probably the most quickly helped clients I work with," Stahlman said. "They are highly motivated to stop the abuse, while continuing the relationship. They are usually simply looking for a way to resolve the issue. When they learn different ways of responding, they're quick to make a change. It's a very fixable situation, once a man has identified and acknowledged the problem.

"That's why I say it's a very changeable situation," she said. "Usually the men who come in here love their wives, or they wouldn't still be in the relationship. They simply need a different approach to resolving conflict."

Marital problems that don't improve affect the whole family. When the wife continues with the pattern abuse against the spouse, the violence is likely to spread to the children, Stahlman said. It's not unusual to see signs of depression, or above normal aggression, in children whose parents are fighting.

"I don't think there's any less impact for children seeing their father beat up their mother, than for children seeing their mother beat up their father."

"Fortunately men who may not have realized it when they show up here, grasp it pretty quickly -- that witnessing violence is hurting their children."

Sometimes, domestic violence impacts a servicemember's ability to do his job, but resolving the issue usually restores the previous level of functioning, Stahlman said.
"Generally speaking, it has a short-term impact on readiness until the problem is addressed," she said.

Since men in abusive situations aren't coming forward themselves, Army leaders are vital in recognizing problems and referring them to family advocacy, according to Stahlman.

"Maybe it's from the family advocacy program education over the years, whatever the cause the Army seems to understand the problem, and they're doing something about it.

"I'm just very impressed that I've had captains of units call me with referrals or first sergeants walk soldiers in and say, 'There's something going on here that shouldn't be going on.' That's really the first step," she said.

(*A substantiated case of abuse is one that fits within a certain pattern of behaviors and injuries on a scale from one to five, with five being the worst.)

(Editor's note -- to contact the post family advocacy office, call Eva Granville at 788-3993.)
y book, Men's Rights Activists.

http://www.lulu.com/content/418976

CaptDMO

Quote
"It's not socially acceptable in our culture to say 'My wife is beating me up.'
sad but true.
So time to move the goal posts!
I see nothing wrong with-
"My partner is violently assaulting me. I'm afraid to act in self defense lest I break a bone or rip tendons. I refuse to enable or escalate unacceptably hostile words or deeds in the presence of my children. My partner is aware of these fears of mine, and yet  consistantly persists. I need help to establish protective custody."

Or something like that!

blackmanx

Quote from: "CaptDMO"
Quote
"It's not socially acceptable in our culture to say 'My wife is beating me up.'
sad but true.
So time to move the goal posts!
I see nothing wrong with-
"My partner is violently assaulting me. I'm afraid to act in self defense lest I break a bone or rip tendons. I refuse to enable or escalate unacceptably hostile words or deeds in the presence of my children. My partner is aware of these fears of mine, and yet  consistantly persists. I need help to establish protective custody."

Or something like that!


I'm  currently  in  summer  school,  taking  up  Criminology  at  the  local  college.  There  are  two  cops  taking  the  class,  along  with regular  students.   The  state  trooper  told  me  that  he  has  seen  male  colleagues  on  the  force  look  the  other  way  when  dealing  with  female  criminals,  out  of  misguided  chivalry  or  something.   The  female  officer,  herself  a  sergeant,  taking  the  course   also  told me  that  she  has  seen  similar  behavior  but  doesn't  condone  it.  This  makes  me  smile.   I'm  going  to  do   Domestic  Violence  :  Not  A  Gender  Issue"   as   my  class  project.   Wish me  luck !
y book, Men's Rights Activists.

http://www.lulu.com/content/418976

TroubledinTacoma

I agree that the Army's resources are available, even more so now that some service members are coming back from tours in Iraq and Afghanistan with psychological trauma.  Resources include: unit and family life chaplains, Social Work Services, Military One Source, Personal Readiness Programs, and post psychiatric and psychological counseling.  However, there are several factors that diminish the potential value of the Army's resources when it comes to dealing with domestic violence.  In some cases, these factors make the penalties for being a service member involved in domestic abuse even worse than being a civilian:

• The Army culture continues to dampen individuals' willingness to use those resources or leaders' willingness to intervene (I assume this extends across the Armed Forces to varying degrees).  Quite simply, many men in uniform cannot come to terms with being regarded as a victim.  In my case (see below), my efforts to get people to consider that I may not be the only abuser in this case are met with disbelief.
• Many Army leaders are unwilling to accept that men are victims because they tend to make assumptions about the nature of domestic violence.  Straus and other's research clearly shows that men are the sole aggressors in about 25% of the DV cases, yet many Army leaders follow the lead of the Victims Advocates, who work for Army Community Services (ACS).  Straight from the Ft. Lewis ACS office's flyer on Domestic Violence Victim Advocacy:

"In all cultures, the perpetrators are most commonly male.  Women are most commonly the victims of domestic violence."

This cultural bias about men's role in aggression has generally perverted many Army leaders thinking and has colored the advice provided by the subject matter experts: the Victims Advocates.  This, in turn, influences a number of decision-making processes that exacerbate already emotionally charged situations (see my anecdote, below).

• When military sanctions are coupled with civilian sanctions as the result of an off-post assault, the results are more devastating than if the assault took place on-post.

Here's my story: I am a 20 year veteran of the Army (17+ Active, 20+ total service).  Several weeks ago my wife my wife and I got into an argument.  A few minutes into the fight she she assaulted me: she spat on me, bit me, and scratched my face.  I pinned her down part way through the confrontation in an effort to calm her down (in retrospect I realized that I had gone too far at this point), and I received several more bites from my wife.  After a couple of minutes, my wife got up and called 911, and three male officers arrived; we live off-post south of Seattle, so the officers were from the municipal police department.  After taking her statement then mine, the officer 'believed that the wife was the dominant aggressor' (a quote from the Arrest Report).  The officer cuffed my wife and read her the Miranda Warnings.  At this point, she burst into tears and said that she was a victim of chronic abuse.  The officer asked if anyone to corroborate her story, and she told him to call her mother.  The officer called her mother, who lives across the country, has spent maybe two weeks with us in the last four years, does not like me, and has never seen an argument between my wife and me.  Despite these issues which might complicate admitting my mother-in-law's testimony as evidence, the officer took her statement over the phone.  The outcome did not surprise me: the officer came back, announced that he believed that my wife was reacting defensively, and arrested me.  If you are familiar with how these cases run then the following should be no surprise to you:

• Encouraged by the YWCA lawyer and the Army Victims' Advocate, my wife put a one-year Order of Protection in place; among other things, it dictates that I cannot communicate with my eight-year old stepson.  I have known my stepson since he was three.
• The courts directed me to participate in a Washington State Domestic Violence Perpetrator's Program for a year (cost $3,000+), even before the arraignment hearing.  This was part of the Order of Protection.
• The unit chain of command approved the Army Victims' Advocate's request to move my wife across the country at government expense because my wife felt unsafe, even with the Order of Protection in place.  
• The post Case Review Committee instructed me to participate in 40+ hours of individual and group therapy.  They also substantiated that my wife was equally culpable for the assault - a move that reportedly aggravated the Victim's Advocate - but the only sanction against my wife was a recommendation to participate in therapy, something she has plainly stated she will not do.
• My commander politely asked me to resign my job because my pending prosecution was embarrassing and because the matter was taking up too much time.  No wonder: I have been spending hours in therapy directed by the Army and the State and in lawyers' offices trying to work on my criminal case and the aftermath of my pending separation (a result of my wife's decision to move across the country).  Being the good Soldier, I resigned and am now on leave.
• Despite demonstrably superior performance over the last year, I received an average evaluation on my most recent evaluation report, a direct result of this incident.  The mid-term consequence: little hope for promotion beyond the next rank.  Long term result: at least a $500k loss of salary and retirement income (in '06 dollars).
• If found guilty on the Domestic Violence IV charge (a misdemeanor) I will be separated from the Army after 17 ˝ years of active service and forfeit my retirement, a result of the Lautenberg amendment.  By contrast, my wife will receive Transitional Compensation for several years.  Translation: even though I may become jobless, the Department of Defense will pay my wife about $16,000 per year (untaxed), continue to provide her with military health and dental benefits, and allow her to retain her ID card and military shopping privileges (shopping on-post is about 30% cheaper than shopping in Washington grocery stores).  This is one of the reasons that my wife told my father that "I don't care what happens to my husband, because I will get a nice big check from the Government".

There's much more to the story: a history of low-level, mutual disrespect and abuse over the last several years; my tours in Afghanistan and Iraq; my wife's history of physical and sexual abuse as a child; financial and other stressors.  All that written, I take responsibility for my actions - I should not have tried to pin my wife down that night, and I did a poor job of handling our arguments over the last few years.  These realizations came largely from the many forms of censure I listed above, and for that I am thankful.  What bothers me is that there is nothing compelling my wife to accept responsibility for her role in our family's history of abuse.  She has not participated in any of the therapy recommended by the Case Review Committee.  Additionally, since I was arrested, my wife has taken up many of the behaviors of the 'family terrorist', which Erin Pizzey described in her article.  I can probably struggle through this, but I am fearful of what will happen to my son (will be three on July 9) and my stepson (age eight).

blackmanx

Quote from: "TroubledinTacoma"
I agree that the Army's resources are available, even more so now that some service members are coming back from tours in Iraq and Afghanistan with psychological trauma.  Resources include: unit and family life chaplains, Social Work Services, Military One Source, Personal Readiness Programs, and post psychiatric and psychological counseling.  However, there are several factors that diminish the potential value of the Army's resources when it comes to dealing with domestic violence.  In some cases, these factors make the penalties for being a service member involved in domestic abuse even worse than being a civilian:

• The Army culture continues to dampen individuals' willingness to use those resources or leaders' willingness to intervene (I assume this extends across the Armed Forces to varying degrees).  Quite simply, many men in uniform cannot come to terms with being regarded as a victim.  In my case (see below), my efforts to get people to consider that I may not be the only abuser in this case are met with disbelief.
• Many Army leaders are unwilling to accept that men are victims because they tend to make assumptions about the nature of domestic violence.  Straus and other's research clearly shows that men are the sole aggressors in about 25% of the DV cases, yet many Army leaders follow the lead of the Victims Advocates, who work for Army Community Services (ACS).  Straight from the Ft. Lewis ACS office's flyer on Domestic Violence Victim Advocacy:

"In all cultures, the perpetrators are most commonly male.  Women are most commonly the victims of domestic violence."

This cultural bias about men's role in aggression has generally perverted many Army leaders thinking and has colored the advice provided by the subject matter experts: the Victims Advocates.  This, in turn, influences a number of decision-making processes that exacerbate already emotionally charged situations (see my anecdote, below).

• When military sanctions are coupled with civilian sanctions as the result of an off-post assault, the results are more devastating than if the assault took place on-post.

Here's my story: I am a 20 year veteran of the Army (17+ Active, 20+ total service).  Several weeks ago my wife my wife and I got into an argument.  A few minutes into the fight she she assaulted me: she spat on me, bit me, and scratched my face.  I pinned her down part way through the confrontation in an effort to calm her down (in retrospect I realized that I had gone too far at this point), and I received several more bites from my wife.  After a couple of minutes, my wife got up and called 911, and three male officers arrived; we live off-post south of Seattle, so the officers were from the municipal police department.  After taking her statement then mine, the officer 'believed that the wife was the dominant aggressor' (a quote from the Arrest Report).  The officer cuffed my wife and read her the Miranda Warnings.  At this point, she burst into tears and said that she was a victim of chronic abuse.  The officer asked if anyone to corroborate her story, and she told him to call her mother.  The officer called her mother, who lives across the country, has spent maybe two weeks with us in the last four years, does not like me, and has never seen an argument between my wife and me.  Despite these issues which might complicate admitting my mother-in-law's testimony as evidence, the officer took her statement over the phone.  The outcome did not surprise me: the officer came back, announced that he believed that my wife was reacting defensively, and arrested me.  If you are familiar with how these cases run then the following should be no surprise to you:

• Encouraged by the YWCA lawyer and the Army Victims' Advocate, my wife put a one-year Order of Protection in place; among other things, it dictates that I cannot communicate with my eight-year old stepson.  I have known my stepson since he was three.
• The courts directed me to participate in a Washington State Domestic Violence Perpetrator's Program for a year (cost $3,000+), even before the arraignment hearing.  This was part of the Order of Protection.
• The unit chain of command approved the Army Victims' Advocate's request to move my wife across the country at government expense because my wife felt unsafe, even with the Order of Protection in place.  
• The post Case Review Committee instructed me to participate in 40+ hours of individual and group therapy.  They also substantiated that my wife was equally culpable for the assault - a move that reportedly aggravated the Victim's Advocate - but the only sanction against my wife was a recommendation to participate in therapy, something she has plainly stated she will not do.
• My commander politely asked me to resign my job because my pending prosecution was embarrassing and because the matter was taking up too much time.  No wonder: I have been spending hours in therapy directed by the Army and the State and in lawyers' offices trying to work on my criminal case and the aftermath of my pending separation (a result of my wife's decision to move across the country).  Being the good Soldier, I resigned and am now on leave.
• Despite demonstrably superior performance over the last year, I received an average evaluation on my most recent evaluation report, a direct result of this incident.  The mid-term consequence: little hope for promotion beyond the next rank.  Long term result: at least a $500k loss of salary and retirement income (in '06 dollars).
• If found guilty on the Domestic Violence IV charge (a misdemeanor) I will be separated from the Army after 17 ˝ years of active service and forfeit my retirement, a result of the Lautenberg amendment.  By contrast, my wife will receive Transitional Compensation for several years.  Translation: even though I may become jobless, the Department of Defense will pay my wife about $16,000 per year (untaxed), continue to provide her with military health and dental benefits, and allow her to retain her ID card and military shopping privileges (shopping on-post is about 30% cheaper than shopping in Washington grocery stores).  This is one of the reasons that my wife told my father that "I don't care what happens to my husband, because I will get a nice big check from the Government".

There's much more to the story: a history of low-level, mutual disrespect and abuse over the last several years; my tours in Afghanistan and Iraq; my wife's history of physical and sexual abuse as a child; financial and other stressors.  All that written, I take responsibility for my actions - I should not have tried to pin my wife down that night, and I did a poor job of handling our arguments over the last few years.  These realizations came largely from the many forms of censure I listed above, and for that I am thankful.  What bothers me is that there is nothing compelling my wife to accept responsibility for her role in our family's history of abuse.  She has not participated in any of the therapy recommended by the Case Review Committee.  Additionally, since I was arrested, my wife has taken up many of the behaviors of the 'family terrorist', which Erin Pizzey described in her article.  I can probably struggle through this, but I am fearful of what will happen to my son (will be three on July 9) and my stepson (age eight).



Outstanding  work,  Tacoma.   Truly  outstanding.  Hat  off  to  you.  A  library  of  info  right  there.  Thank  you.
y book, Men's Rights Activists.

http://www.lulu.com/content/418976

TroubledinTacoma

Quote from: blackmanx
Outstanding  work,  Tacoma.   Truly  outstanding.  Hat  off  to  you.  A  library  of  info  right  there.  Thank  you.



blackmanx,

This was my first time posting to this board, so I am still trying to get a handle on the tone of the posts.  What did I write that was useful?

The reason that I posted was not to polish my halo and to convince readers that I am blameless.  My halo is tarnished and much of that is my own doing.  As I posted earlier, the pending censure of the criminal justice system, coupled with all of the administrative remedies, have given me a sharp wakeup call: In short, "I get it".  What compelled me to post here are two issues:

1. I am concerned about the contrast between my offense - wrongfully restraining my wife after she had assaulted me a couple of times - and the disproportionate force of the punishments or administrative measures that have the effect of punishments (outlined here so you don't have to wade through the thread):
• I have lost contact with my wife and stepson and am losing the battle to spend time with my three year old son
• I am hemorrhaging money in an effort to cover the civil and criminal legal expenses and pay for the state-mandated classes,
• My commander pressured to resign my job (most enjoyable job I have had in the Army)
• My commander noted during my evaluation counseling session that my 'relationship issues' have impacted my professional potential (I noted in my earlier post that this will probably cost me more than $500k in potential income)
• If convicted of a misdemeanor, I will lose the 18 years I have invested in the military
• And through all of this, I have watched my commander and the victims' advocates effectively reward my wife's behavior by moving her out of the state at government expense and promising her compensation if I am separated from the armed forces as a result of a misdemeanor conviction.

For people to have faith in a nation's justice system, they must sense that there is a sense of proportion in the punishments - remember Valjean (the bread thief) in Les Miserables?  My experience has wakened me up to the fact that the DV systems in the Army and in many U.S. municipalities are bankrupt.  I would even go so far as to speculate that the system is likely creating more violence than it is preventing: The U.S. now has a significant number of children raised without the active participation of their fathers and reared by violent women whose antisocial behaviors have been tacitly endorsed by the criminal justice system and victims' advocacy agencies.

2. The other aspect of this that bothers me has to do with the poor decision making evidenced in my case.  I recently finished reading Malcolm Gladwell's 'Blink', and believe that I have a pretty good understanding of rapid decision making.  In my case, there were several instances where decision makers relied on their quick judgment, but those judgments were skewed by prejudice.  The arresting officer initially assessed that my wife was the dominant aggressor and even started to arrest her, but this violated what he had been taught: men are the abusers and women are the victims.  Therefore, when my wife cried, the officer quickly looked for an out, and this led him to rely on telephone testimony from a hostile witness, who in fact had never witnessed anything.  Later on, one document - the initial arrest report - was used by decision makers to implement the Order of Protection, to support my wife's request to move from the state, and to order my mandatory participation in state approved classes.  Not one of these decision makers looked at the document critically, because their biases colored their judgment.  If the decision makers had slowed down and read the arrest report carefully, they would have wondered why the officer started to arrest my wife and then allowed unlawful testimony to change his mind. Finally, there are the other decisions - the polite request for me to resign my post and my commander's assessment that my otherwise outstanding performance had been diminished by my relationship problems, a decision that will limit my professional potential (assuming I do not get administratively separated from the Army).  It's clear to me that by this point - a month after my arrest - the 'group think' was overwhelming; I was clearly guilty because I had been arrested, had an Order of Protection in place against me, and had been ordered to take the military directed and State approved classes for DV perpetrators.  

After looking at a number of the stories on this and other sites, I suspect that the injustice and poor decision making evident in my case is not unique.

Troubled

CaptDMO

Quote from: "TroubledinTacoma"
Quote from: "blackmanx"
Outstanding  work,  Tacoma.   Truly  outstanding.  Hat  off  to  you.  A  library  of  info  right  there.  Thank  you.



After looking at a number of the stories on this and other sites, I suspect that the injustice and poor decision making evident in my case is not unique.

Troubled


No, your case is not unique.
But the clarity of thought, and focus in writing
(compared to mine)is.

BRIAN

Tacoma,

Why exactly was it wrong for you to pin your wife down? What should you have done let her continue to beat on you? It's a shame that the system is stacked against men so heavily that men can't defend themselves against a woman even with minimal force.

Years ago we had a 1LT at Ft hood who lived on onbase housing. His wife dumped a pot of scalding coffee in his lap. The only thing that happened was that they were both kicked out of their quarters. Doesn't seem right does it?
You may sleep soundly at night because rough men stand ready to visit violence upon those who seek to harm you.

TroubledinTacoma

Brian,

The circumstances were such that I could have left the room after my wife attacked me, but I opted to try to control the situation by restraining my wife (the multiple bite marks and my arrest showed that I failed miserably).  This realization may reflect that I have been effectively neutered as a result of all of the military- and state-directed counseling; however, I prefer to think that I am learning something.  I have come to understand that in my situation, leaving the room was always a viable choice.  Moreover, I am starting to realize that in preceding arguments, if I had opted to use tools that broke up the tempo of the arguments between my wife and me - time outs, "I" focused language, etc. - I may have disarmed my wife and avoided a confrontation.  

That written, here are three observations for the benefit of others:

1. My experience will not necessarily align with others.  Unlike the lieutenant's wife, my wife never got anywhere close to pouring scalding water on me.  I always had the option of controlling the situation by refusing to let the argument get physical; apparently, the lieutenant did not have that choice.  

2. Brian, you are right: The deck is stacked against men.  Men must absolutely understand this and respond accordingly.  One option consists of the man setting his ego aside and seeking help.  As I observed above, it is possible that if one person changes the tempo of disagreements, that alone may be sufficient to break the cycle and allow both parties to start to heal.  There are a lot of qualifiers to making this work; nonetheless, this is the route that I am pursuing.  Alternately, if the woman in a relationship acts like a sociopath - pouring scalding water on your husband likely qualifies - then maybe the man is best served by leaving the relationship.  Trying to win a physical confrontation with someone like that is a crap shoot, and as you observed, the justice system and social services will rarely vindicate a man no matter how egregious the offense against him is.

3. My perception is that employing the various tools that therapists recommend - time outs, etc - is particularly tough for service members and for law enforcement personnel.  Unlike most of our brothers walking the streets, Soldiers and police officers are trained - and authorized - to keep our survival instincts tuned up.  I have found that it is challenging to come home and turn off responses that are useful at work but destructive at home.  

Troubled

Go Up