Solicit opinion from (un-named here) ex-pat Tommy, Yank, and Digger "boaties" that have chosen to drop off the radar around former Carribian and Oceania colonies.
Solicit opinion from (un-named here) ex-pats that have chosen SE Asia/ Pacific Rim, and live the life of MGTOW while maintaining loose asscciation with their kindred.
Solicit opinion from (un-named here) folks in Mexico, and parts South, that have dropped out and are living quite comfortably, while maintaining loose asscciation with their kindred .
The problem, as I see it, is-while the concept espoused by Ragnar has been around for quite some time, its practitioners don't particularly care to de-lurk, can be quite difficult contact, or convince of the value of re-accessing the Main-Stream for (apparently) pissing matches in Wikipedia, or on-line ego driven book review wars.
Possible citation threads.
current trends in marriage vs. cohabitation, Esp. with children, as recorded by Govt. agencies.
Marriage strike backlash-
Trends in palamony awards- Esp. California beginning late 1970's
Recent (2 year+) "domestic partner" vagina/felatio monitory awards in England
Any other legal and political "backlash" actions in response to current trends of the "unorganized" "unofficial", and "under the radar" MGTOW.
(sperm donor shortage, liberal arts college application/ED complaints)
Soldier of Fortune Magazine
Unclassified CIA, State Department, Veterans Affairs geographical data.
Mother Jones MagazineEx Parte
, or other court documents citing "...address unknown.."
US and UK postal data citing demographics of "..no forwarding address.."
US Census data- (I have NO idea how this works in UK, Can, AU, Ger, ITY, FR, SP, MEX, , or ANYWHERE in the land of Thor, AFR, Asia, Russia, etc.)
And of course, "international" bars in world class sea and air ports. I
The mere fact that there is dispute and controversy
regarding the issue is fact enough for a Peoples Encyclopedia that MGTOW os indeed an entity. Entries such as
"....and often subject to politicly motivated and concerted denial of citation, specificly by those opposed to the values implied....". as well as restating the purpose that Wikipedia is not a forum for recognition competition, merely an intellectual repository. (perhaps found in the Charter of intent one would hope) may serve well .
Not to mention an intellectualy prudent use of "contested", or "disputed"
I certainly find it odd that entries "disappear" the next day
the "feminist data clerk" phenomina should be examined!
Part of the Communist manifesto/ Marxist dupe agenda- so endeared by radical Feminists (see Wikipedia)
-is to quietly establish such positions in bureaucracy to establish manipulation of competitive information. A lesson learned from espionage 101.
Perhaps determination of WHO EXACTLY is authorised to delete entries, and a complaint to the head cheese, will prove fruitful. It did at Amazon book review!
But that's just me.