Legalized Summary Execution

Started by KellyMB, Jun 05, 2006, 07:58 PM

previous topic - next topic
Go Down

KellyMB

Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) is caused mainly by drug and alcohol abuse, and mental problems. Both are diseases with chartable clinical symptons and a known progression. If you unempower women by telling them that they are trapped, helpless, and can only be free by committing cold blooded murder, you are not doing them a favor. This law allows the summary execution of alcoholics and the mentally ill. A great leap forward, not.





http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/local/states/california/northern_california/14718354.htm

Abused woman acquitted of murdering husband after second trial
JULIANA BARBASSA
Associated Press
MODESTO, Calif. - Surrounded by family members wearing bright yellow T-shirts emblazoned with her picture, Cheryl Orange was teary-eyed and beaming Thursday, talking about the joy of holding the 10 grandchildren born during the 21 years she spent in jail for killing her abusive husband.

She walked out of Stanislaus County Public Safety Center on Thursday, a day after she was acquitted by a jury that was able to rehear her murder case under a law that grants new trials to battered women.

"I'm finally truly free," Orange said, adding that one of the first things she was looking forward to was a big French toast breakfast. "Thank you, Jesus. Thank you, Jesus. Thank you, Jesus."

Orange, 52, was the first woman to receive an acquittal during a second trial granted by the 2001 law, which allows victims of domestic violence who kill their partners to present evidence of the abuse in court, lawyers said.

"It was certainly disappointing," said prosecutor Carol Shipley. "It was very emotional. What she went through was detailed graphically. Anyone listening to that would've been upset by it. ... We presented evidence that she was as violent as he was, but the jury felt she should be acquitted."

In 1985, Orange was charged with murdering her husband, Frank Orange. She shot him six times with a stolen rifle, but claimed she'd been acting in self-defense. When the jury couldn't reach a verdict, she pleaded guilty to second-degree murder and was sentenced to 17 years to life.

At the time, her lawyer couldn't introduce evidence that she was in a dangerous relationship with a man whose beatings had landed her in the hospital twice, Orange said.

He locked her repeatedly in the trunk of his car, raped her, threatened her with a knife, smothered her and even trained his pit bull to watch her every move, she said.

One month before the murder, she went to the district attorney's office after a beating, and they documented her injuries, but back then, it was simply her word against his, said her lawyer, Kellee Malone.

Two of the original trial jurors were contacted for the appeal, Malone said. They said the jury had been divided, and if they'd known about the abuse, they might have acquitted her. Those statements were included as part of the new trial, which began May 9.

"This time, everything came out, everything was aired," Malone said. "I'm ecstatic."

Andrea Bible, co-coordinator of the California Habeas Project, which has gone to prisons to explain the 2001 law, identify candidates for release and connect them with pro bono lawyers called Orange's case "an incredibly important victory."

"I hope it'll have an impact on similar cases," she said.

In addition to Orange, 16 women have been released under the law by filing petitions to the judge who convicted them or by becoming eligible through the parole process. Twenty other cases are pending.

In 2004, the Legislature expanded the reach of that law to include victims of domestic violence convicted of other felonies in which the abuse was relevant.

Now, Orange is back at her mother's place, a small home with a lush garden and walls papered with family portraits. She has 11 grandchildren - the oldest is 22, the youngest is 2. Ten of those children were born while she was incarcerated.

She said she plans to take things slowly, first applying for a new identification card, then contacting an organization that helps inmates adjust to life outside and connecting with a support group for battered women.

She said she also has big plans. In prison, she received counseling and became a mentor to other inmates. Now she wants to go to college, and become a counselor herself, helping other battered women break out of violent relationships.

She has the support of the family who waited for her outside, wondering sometimes if she'd ever get out, but never doubting she deserved to be free.

"It's not going to be easy for her," said her mother, Evelyn Johnwell. "She'll have to adjust. But she can stay here as long as she needs to. Now she has all the time in the world."

Celtic Druid

Quote


"It was certainly disappointing," said prosecutor Carol Shipley. "It was very emotional. What she went through was detailed graphically. Anyone listening to that would've been upset by it. ... We presented evidence that she was as violent as he was, but the jury felt she should be acquitted."

In 1985, Orange was charged with murdering her husband, Frank Orange. She shot him six times with a stolen rifle, but claimed she'd been acting in self-defense. When the jury couldn't reach a verdict, she pleaded guilty to second-degree murder and was sentenced to 17 years to life.



As usual these trials are more a 'empathy test' and how much of an emotional roller coaster of a ride the manipulative accused can take them on.

Facts such as she was as violent as he was become no longer relevant - when the jury are whipped up into a frenzy of sympathy and socially induced associated guilt.

You have the two extremes of social perception and reaction regarding domestic violence.

1. If a woman is physically abusive or sexually assaulting (groin kicking) a man, this is hilarious. Also, he must never raise his hands even in defence of his very life.

2. If a man is physically abusive even verbally so. He is deserved of death and she has the right to be judge,jury and executioner. No one must question this or be labelled a misogynist.

3. Now imagine reversing the genders in 1 and 2 and realize how preposterous it sounds.

Invariably, what I have learned regarding domestic violence, is that regardless of the abundance of overwhelming evidence that shows a woman to be as violent or exclusively so - she is immediately exonerated by default of gender alone. Gynocentrism has become so all consuming and pervasive that facts/truth are no longer pertinent, merely the arrangement of one's genitalia.

Society has become so infested with decades of succesful feminist/pc brainwashing, that very few escape the omnipresent forceful pull of the fematrix. Those 'awakened' that do, are vastly outnumbered by a subjugated swell of mere automaton's - who obsessively repeat in a demented fashion the nihilistic propaganda of their masters.

Ok, I'm straying a bit. End of rant.  :lol:
ttp://antimisandry.com

The internet has been like a lifeboat for mens opposition to the floodings of feminism.
--Celtic Druid

Respect is earned, not automatically attained by virtue of the arrangement of one's genitalia.
--Celtic Druid

"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.
Joseph Goebbels

Quentin0352

Quote
a day after she was acquitted by a jury that was able to rehear her murder case under a law that grants new trials to battered women.


Gee, and to think I am unable to get a protective order though there are tons of police reports and witnesses about my ex threatening, harassing and assaulting me. I guess if I killed her I could make the same claims and get away with it? Anyone want to bet I would never be allowed out?

JoeFin

Quote from: "Quentin0352"
Gee, and to think I am unable to get a protective order though there are tons of police reports and witnesses about my ex threatening, harassing and assaulting me. I guess if I killed her I could make the same claims and get away with it?


No one wants to admit that women can mutually violent

Quote
The reluctance of men to report domestic victimisation can be seen from official sources. Police force statistics for recorded incidents of domestic violence show proportions of male victims varying generally between 10 and 20%, although some forces show higher proportions (Yarwood (1997) (29) ).

Comparison of these relatively modest proportions with the prevalence of male victims of domestic assaults revealed by academic studies and in Home Office Research Study 191 (15) results, showing a proportion of 40% male victims in the long-term, strongly suggests, therefore, a substantial under-reporting by men of domestic violence against them by female partners, far more than by female victims

Even if men attempt to report their victimisation, they are likely to find they are discriminated against. In an American study of police officer responses to victims of domestic violence (Buzawa and Austin (1993) (30) ), male victims were unanimously critical of police officer reactions despite the fact that the male victims were reported to have sustained more severe injuries than the female victims in the study.
http://www.dewar4research.org/docs/pdm.pdf


Or that laws such as this one serve as a free pass for women to commit murder

Quote
There is already evidence within both family law and criminal law that some women, falsely claiming self-defence as a motive for their violence, are able to manipulate the legal process trading upon the prejudice that exists against male victims.

"I saw Austin once and he was cut down the side of his face from his ear downwards ... She broke his nose once and he was so ashamed he told everyone at work he'd been mugged ...She was bragging about it and thought it was great a girl could do that to a man."

Sister of Austin White, who was stabbed through the heart and left to die on the floor by his girlfriend. (as reported by Su Pennington, Independent on Sunday, 29th November 1996).
http://www.dewar4research.org/docs/pdm.pdf
Resident Sh!! house attorney at large

realman

Am I the only one who thinks that, as fucked up as her husband was, she probably could have, umm, LEFT? You know, like before the abuse got totally out of hand, and before anyone was DEAD? Go to a shelter. Get on a plane and don't tell anyone where you went. Call the cops and get HIM locked up (he did deserve that from the sound of it).

Infantile. Like how you handle a 3 year old because while what they did was wrong, they also didn't really know better or have the emotional and mental capacities to do the right thing.

Women don't understand that crap like this doesn't empower them, it actually makes them look like they don't have emotional and mental capacities developed beyod those of a 3 year old...

stands2p

Six times!?  Was this stolen rifle a machine gun?

Shooting someone once is self-defense.  
The next bullet is assault with a deadly weapon.  
The next is manslaughter.  
The fourth bullet is 2nd degree murder, a crime of passion.  
Number five is premeditated, first degree murder.  
Number six is just littering.

This is another law meant to enshrine the false notion that women are victims and men are abusers.  Once she had that gun in her hand, she had a wide range of choices.  She chose to kill him and make sure he was dead.  That is a textbook definition of 1st degree murder.  I wonder if any of her adoring family members will begin to wonder, now that she is going to be attending family picnics, what was going through her mind as she pulled the trigger again, and again, and again, and again, and again, and, oh yes, again.
The Lord works in strange ways; and with strange people.

stands2p

And how do you train a dog to watch someone's every move?  "Watching someone's every move" is a complex, human behavior and a term that is meant to raise a jury's sympathies.  Did the dog keep a notebook of her activities?  If this was a mutually abusive relationship, and it sounds like it was, it seems more likely he trained the dog to protect him while he slept.
The Lord works in strange ways; and with strange people.

JoeFin

You guys have really got to read the arguments put forth in this brief. It certainly proves beyond the shadow of a doubt these cases of supposed "Battered Woman's Syndrome" are warrentless dispatch of justice

Quote
Various studies have shown women admitting making assaults on male partners and not claiming that it was in self-defence. In America, Mann (1990) (16) investigated a sample of women imprisoned for murder of their male partner and found that not one claimed to have been battered. She also found that 70% killed their victims when they were drunk, helpless (bound), or asleep, and that nearly 60% pre-planned the killing

"The battered woman syndrome illustrates all that is wrong with the law's use of science". (Introduction, page 68).

" The battered woman syndrome ultimately fails because it was never a matter of science to begin with, and yet it was treated as a "scientific fact" by courts."

http://www.dewar4research.org/docs/pdm.pdf


But on another note, I saw the TV news reports of her home coming. Of course they tried to focus on the family gathering which made me wonder why none of her children were interviewed. Yes their mother was incarcerated but their father is DEAD.

I don't think it was by chance none the feminist friendly news reporters did not interview the children
Resident Sh!! house attorney at large

Go Up