Point taken, Darth. I will refrain from the further use of melodrama. It's not typical of me though - at least I hope not. I don't know what got into me. :?
I have been known to have a flair for the dramatic myself. We are all human. We get angry.
I am approaching this from this perspective: a few posters do not find value in certain cases of "staying at home" and have provided some argumentation as to why they hold that opinion. Yes, the opinion has undoubtedly been presented in a hostile manner, but we would do well to understand they are not the authority when it comes to appraising the worth of a traditional lifestyle choice like "staying at home."
Personally, I do not understand why these discussions are so important in the first place. To me, the real problem is "no-fault" divorce and the casual disregard of marriage vows. I have never been married, but if I ever do, I intend to take the vows seriously. There is, of course, no guarantee my spouse would have a similar intention. What is worse is the law does nothing to encourage couples to take marriage seriously. It can be ended at the drop of the hat with no consequences for the one who initiates it. That is not only wrong but destructive. Marriage is taken much less seriously than any old contract, and it enrages me.
You seem to regard marriage highly, and I applaud you for it. Marriage is an institution worth saving, and we need more people to fight for it.