No. He's saying that most gay men dislike feminine men. They desire, and want to be masculine.
Yes, that they are totally confused...how did they become confused?
Stonewall was a violent uprising of feminine gay men against police intrusion. That's what started it and it had nothing to do with feminism.
Yeah and that whole "equality for homosexuals" argument that mirrored feminism and is defended by feminists (as it destroys families and protects lesbians) is irrelevent?
How many feminists organizations do you see fighting against gay rights (and demonstrations like in SF)?
But this is entirely different then the idea that feminism creates a non-gender normative society in which homosexuality flourishes.
Yes of course it is different and not meant to be taken as proof of my argument. None of these men turned gay but what they were saying is that if they were gay...they would not have to deal with women and their guardians...the biased courts. Now, does that have anything to do with feminism?
In fact I would question the idea that feminism doesn't engage in distinguishing between men and women. Feminism is very much about seeing men as being more agressive, violent and selfish then women. It only denies that men have positive qualities that women don't have, not that men have negative qualities that women don't have.
Funny thing about feminism is it's inconsistency.
Yes, feminism does claim that men have negative qualities women don't have...the whole DV industry is all about that testosterone (sp?) factor.
One minute we are all equal and gender is nothing more than a social construct created by the evil patriarchy. The next man = bad, woman = good. See how that is inconsistent?
In the end though, feminism is all about getting what it wants even if it has to change it's story over and over again.